SCUP
 

Learning Resources

Your Higher Education Planning Library

Combine search terms, filters, institution names, and tags to find the vital resources to help you and your team tackle today’s challenges and plan for the future. Get started below, or learn how the library works.
DISPLAYING 2876 RESOURCES

FOUND 2876 RESOURCES

Clear All
ABSTRACT:  | 
SORT BY:  | 
Planning for Higher Education Journal

Published
September 1, 2005

Featured Image

Closing the Accountability Gap for Public Universities: Putting Academic Departments in the Performance Loop

Accountability programs become increasingly invisible on campus below the vice presidential level and academic departments are often left entirely out of the loop. That creates a disabling disconnect among societal concerns, institutional goals, and departmental aspirations. Adopting feedback loops with common departmental indicators can enhance accountability without threatening the unique nature of higher education institutions.

From Volume 34 Number 1 | September–November 2005

Abstract: A fatal flaw in accountability programs is that they leave academic departments-the units most responsible for results-out of the performance loop. This article ties together institutional priorities and departmental performance through a limited list of common departmental indicators. It also links institutional aims and departmental aspirations through a planning process using institutional and departmental feedback loops, which convey performance information but also create new knowledge through dialogue on performance. This planning approach fixes a fatal flaw in accountability programs; a similar process at Florida International University shows it works in practice.

Member Price:
Free  | Login

Member-only Resource

Join now to have access

Planning for Higher Education Journal

Published
September 1, 2005

Featured Image

Designing Postsecondary Education to Meet Future Learning Needs: Imperatives for Planning

The long-term effectiveness of postsecondary institutions is inextricably linked to students’ learning outcomes. Students need to be considered learners who participate actively in their own learning, teaching processes must be reconceptualized as learning processes, and educational goals must be reconceptualized to meet the needs of individual and professional goals.

From Volume 34 Number 1 | September–November 2005

Abstract: Many sectors in American postsecondary education are experiencing rapid growth, largely due to the maintained and increased need for educational services, research capabilities, and public outreach, community service, and civic engagement opportunities. The factors shaping the institutional responses include demographic changes, pressure for increased accountability, higher expectations, and greater competition. These factors, among others, compel institutions to rethink their present structures and activities and to envision a future designed to meet the demands of an increasingly heterogeneous group of stakeholders. This article discusses how these changes are causing academic and institutional planners to reconsider the traditional perspectives in the face of emerging concepts in the delivery of educational services. Particular attention is paid to three topics that are key to the rethinking of service delivery. First, students should be considered learners who participate actively in their own learning. This, in turn, implies that teaching practices must be reconceptualized as learning processes. In addition, educational goals must be reconceptualized to meet the needs of individual and professional goals. The implications of these emerging views for strategies for institutional planning are discussed.

Member Price:
Free  | Login

Member-only Resource

Join now to have access

Planning for Higher Education Journal

Published
September 1, 2005

Featured Image

Positioning the University Library in the New Learning Environment

Libraries must be designed to promote and sustain the development of the learning communities that are emerging in universities. This article describes an attempt at Australia’s largest university to reinvigorate the role of the central library and to make it more pedagogically relevant through the provision of spaces designed to facilitate the creation of communities of learners.

From Volume 34 Number 1 | September–November 2005

Abstract: Universities worldwide are reconfiguring their campus environments to respond to the emerging pedagogy within higher education with its emphasis on self-directed, collaborative, and problem-solving approaches to learning. In particular, there is an emphasis on forming “learning communities.” In this context libraries are increasingly required to accommodate learning that is more active, collaborative, and that involves considerable use of communication and information technology (CIT) in spaces previously consigned to passive, individual learning. Drawing on the author's involvement as a member of the design team, this article examines the approach at one Australian university library to align its spaces and facilities to meet the emerging pedagogy within higher education.

Member Price:
Free  | Login

Member-only Resource

Join now to have access

Planning for Higher Education Journal

Published
September 1, 2005

Featured Image

Strategic Planning in Portuguese Higher Education Institutions

This article surveys the history and current nature of strategic planning in European higher education institutions, concluding that although built upon centuries of cultural tradition and heritage, Portuguese higher education is at a critical point where it is open to the concept of strategic planning, despite the inevitability that such planning will alter the status quo.

From Volume 34 Number 1 | September–November 2005

Abstract: A national study on strategic planning in Portuguese higher education was conducted. The presidents or rectors of 61 public and private higher education institutions in Portugal responded regarding their knowledge of and involvement in strategic planning. The questionnaire addressed whether or not the institutions were using a planning process, what specific components of the process were being employed, institutional benefits and problems associated with the process, and personal benefits derived from the experience. A critical analysis of selected results is provided with comparisons to planning in the United States. Cultural differences and similarities related to the process of planning are noted, and projections on future directions for Portugal and the European Union with respect to strategic planning efforts are offered.

Member Price:
Free  | Login

Member-only Resource

Join now to have access

Planning for Higher Education Journal

Published
June 1, 2005

Featured Image

Bricks and Mortar: A Faculty View

Ten years ago, the possible demise of the physical campus was a rallying call to action, yet today, construction cranes rise over campuses in greater numbers than ever. What is the nature of a college campus, beyond just some landscaping and a collection of buildings? Why and how should campuses take pains to distinguish themselves from other types of public or quasi-public spaces?

From Volume 33 Number 4 | June–August 2005

Abstract: Current building projects on college and university campuses tend to be planned and funded according to commercial needs and opportunities. Often planning is done without faculty knowledge or advice. The result can be a distraction of the institution’s mission from its core values of service and community. Campus planners can avoid this distraction by making sure that faculty governance has its say before projects begin.

Member Price:
Free  | Login

Member-only Resource

Join now to have access

Planning for Higher Education Journal

Published
June 1, 2005

Featured Image

Planning for the Digital Classroom and Distributed Learning: Policies and Planning for Online Instructional Resources

This article is written to provide guidance for planners at all levels with regard to the technologies and protocols involved in digital classrooms and online learning. Learn what a ‘learning object’ is, how intellectual property and copyright issues complicate things, how to sustain an online program, and what the currently emerging issues are.

From Volume 33 Number 4 | June–August 2005

Abstract: In an era of state budget cuts and a tight economy, distributed learning is often seen as a way to address the needs of colleges and universities looking for additional revenue sources. Likewise, budding virtual universities, consortia, and corporate partnerships are now providing new ways for institutions to share resources across campuses. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the relevance of learning objects contained within digital repositories as they relate to institutional policy with regard to new distributed learning environments. This article describes how institutions of higher education have come to embrace the learning object model and what should be considered as they plan for further development in this area.

Member Price:
Free  | Login

Member-only Resource

Join now to have access